Karma & Dharma

We have been talking about Karma for more than a month now. One thing that keeps coming up is what happens if you do something as part of your job. Does it have a negative effect associated with it? In general, the answer is yes with a few caveats.

Let’s talk about the exceptions first. If there is an imminent danger to living beings and doing harm to one person protects many lives, then there is no negative effect of Karma. There are examples of these in spiritual texts. One example is of Buddha. In his previous life, Buddha was traveling on a boat full of merchants. Through his clairvoyance, he saw that one of the passengers was about to kill the rest of the merchants. To save all of those lives and to save that one passenger from getting negative karma for killing all of those people, Buddha killed the one passenger.

In today’s world, it would be equivalent to knowing an imminent terror threat and neutralizing the terrorists before they could attack. But barring an imminent threat to many lives, there is no justification for negative actions that I could find in the textbooks.

Now it is debatable whether simply working somewhere generates negative action or not. For example, let’s say someone works as a bookkeeper at a slaughterhouse. I am not sure that they generate negative action of killing just by working at the slaughterhouse. Because for negative actions to occur four conditions have to be present as we discussed last week.

So let’s talk about another exception which is what if something is part of your job. The so-called “dharma” we keep talking about. In ancient times, a soldier on a battlefield who followed certain rules and only fought with someone of their equivalency was an exception. This soldier was not affected by his actions. However, in today’s world, modern warfare is such that there are hardly any rules. Everyone is killing everyone else without discrimination and that is certainly not considered an exception. Also, if someone is following an order but knows that the order is morally wrong, then we have a duty not to follow that order otherwise negative actions are attached. Also, continuing killing after someone is no longer a threat has negative actions attached to it. Another thing I want to point out is that a soldier has a duty to avoid collateral damage. If trying to kill one bad person ends up killing 10 innocent people, then there is a negative action attached to it. Again, I refer back to the four conditions we discussed last week.

Now let’s come back to real life. For those of us who are not soldiers, if our job makes us compromise our moral standards, in my opinion, if possible, we should find another job. Let’s take the example of the bookkeeper in a slaughterhouse. Even if they are not collecting any negative karma, the fact that it is against their moral standards would keep bothering them. It would become stressful at times. And it makes sense in that case to go find a different place to work. If for nothing else then for our own sanity.

Buddha said that ” … a lay follower should not engage in five types of business. Which five? Business in weapons, business in human beings, business in meat, business in intoxicants, and business in poison.”

So those five professions one should avoid for sure. Beyond that, a lot of this comes down to our own moral compass and what we are comfortable with. For example, as a rule, I have stayed away from investing in properties where tenants sell alcohol or marijuana. This is a personal rule with the logic being that if I don’t want to consume something then I should avoid making money out of the consumption of those substances.

While doing research on this topic, I came across Laxmi Tantra (one of the five panch tantras). According to Laxmi Tantra, one should avoid making a livelihood through

1. Living off other people (begging for example)

2. Loan sharking

3. Bribery

4. Living by a profession or industry which directly or indirectly causes suffering to other beings such as the meat and leather industries, munitions industries, or brewing and selling of alcohol or drugs.

5. Superintending mines and factories is also forbidden because it can lead to corruption, harshness, and exploitation of the poor and vulnerable. It also leads to the depredation of the environment through deforestation and pollution which are considered sinful activities by the Shastras.

The seven legitimate ways for a spiritual aspirant to make a living are:

1. daya — inheritance

2. labha — profit from honest commerce and trade.

3. kraya — purchase of land and assets for the purpose of speculation.

4. jaya — winning prizes or money in a competition

5. prayoga — through the application of learning and skills to benefit others – through counseling, advising, teaching, etc.

6. karma yoga — through a profession or a vocational job serving others.

7. satpratigraha — the lawful acceptance of gifts — that is, unsolicited donations.

So I hope this clears up a lot of confusion around the issue and hopefully, I have not made the matter worse!